Kelly O'Connor

Welcome, readers! Today, we’re delving into a topic that often sparks heated debates in the financial world – the comparison between insurance commissions and asset management fees. Join us as we break down the intricacies of these two compensation models and explore how they can impact your financial journey.

Understanding the Fee vs. Commission Debate:

You may have come across discussions regarding the purportedly exorbitant commissions associated with insurance products. But is this comparison as straightforward as it seems? Let’s take a closer look at the numbers and unravel the truth behind these claims.

Comparing the Fees and Commissions:

To analyze the comparison, we’re going to use a hypothetical scenario. Imagine an individual who invests $50,000 annually for ten years and then stops contributing but keeps it invested for another 10 years. If these funds were directed into an investment account with an assumed 8% rate of return, it’s reasonable to apply a 1% asset management fee each year. At the end of those 20 years, the account would have paid $161,711 in fees alone…which is $220,030 in total opportunity costs.

On the flip side, we’ll consider a life insurance policy that is funded with $50,000 over a 10 year period and the insurance company paying the financial professional a commission. The insurance agent would receive not only a first year’s commission but also nine more years of renewal commission each year the premium of $50,000 is paid. The renewal commissions decrease over time. After year 10, the agent, on average, would have received a total commission of $58,500 paid from the insurance company. Keep in mind, this commission is NOT paid from the policy – unlike the investment – which means there are no lost opportunity costs.

Grasping the Opportunity Cost:

As we delve into the numbers, it’s important to understand the concept of opportunity cost. When a fee is paid from an investment account, it incurs an opportunity cost – the growth that could have been earned on that fee amount if it remained invested. This cost provides valuable insight into the true impact of fees over time.

The Investment Scenario:

In the investment scenario, where an 8% annual return is assumed, the 1% asset management fee is paid each year. While the cumulative fee over time may seem relatively manageable, it’s the associated opportunity cost that demands attention…again, what the fee could have earned if it remained in the account.

The Insurance Commission Scenario:

In the case of an insurance policy, the financial professional earns commissions, which are typically higher in the initial years of the policy. The commission percentage decreases over time, often aligning with a predetermined payment schedule. The commission structure is essentially the financial professional’s compensation for establishing the insurance policy.

Comparing Long-Term Impact:

As we extend our analysis to a longer time horizon – say, 40 years – the disparity in outcomes becomes more apparent. The cumulative fees associated with the investment account continue to compound, resulting in a substantial impact on the account’s growth. The lost opportunity cost continues to accentuate the financial impact of the fees. Investment fees FAR exceed insurance commissions.

Unveiling the Truth:

The comparison between insurance commissions and asset management fees isn’t a straightforward one. While it’s true that insurance commissions can be higher in the initial years, they don’t carry the same ongoing impact as asset management fees. The opportunity cost, which is often overlooked, can significantly influence the overall financial outcome.

Navigating Financial Relationships:

The analysis also highlights the importance of considering the nature of your financial relationship. Financial advisors typically aim for long-term relationships where their expertise can be leveraged over an extended period. Whether it’s for investment, insurance, or a comprehensive financial strategy, understanding the fee structure and its long-term implications is crucial.

Final Thoughts: Empowering Informed Decisions:

As you navigate the realm of financial planning and consult with professionals, keep in mind the nuanced nature of fee structures. While insurance commissions may seem substantial initially, it’s essential to weigh them against the ongoing nature of asset management fees and their associated opportunity costs. Making informed decisions requires a comprehensive understanding of both sides of the coin.

In conclusion, remember that your financial journey is unique. It’s wise to seek advice from knowledgeable professionals who can guide you based on your specific goals and circumstances. By being well-informed about fee structures and their long-term implications, you’re better equipped to create a financial strategy that aligns with your aspirations.

If you’re ready to explore your financial strategy further, take advantage of the opportunity to engage with a financial professional who understands the nuances of fees and commissions. Your financial future deserves nothing less than a comprehensive and informed approach.


Related Blogs

Unveiling the Truth: Average vs. Actual Investment Returns

We all want to make reasonable financial decisions for the future. However,

Read More

Cracking the Code: Pre-Tax vs. Post-Tax Investments

When it comes to investing for your future, the choices can sometimes

Read More

Decoding Government Budgets, Taxes, and the Urgency for Informed Financial Planning

Greetings, readers! Join us for an eye-opening discussion that unveils the intricacies

Read More

Kelly O’Connor is a master coach and trainer with a decades-long career in sales, marketing, and insurance. An industry leader, alongside top producers developing programs, he quickly became Colorado’s #1 speaker within the charter school system, traveling the state to speak in front of thousands of people and financial planners. A true visionary and figurehead for the community, he’s invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in marketing, coaching, and training masterminds and mentors.

hear what our clients have said

Hollie Clere,  Social Media Strategist

After having had a bad experience with a financial person in the past, I asked Kelly some hard questions before even introducing him to my husband. Most of it had to do with trust, focus and decisions we had gotten hurt with in the past. Kelly not only paid attention to every detail to the aspects to my questions but showed me where we had made some great choices and talked about the importance of each decision. He nis relationship focused. When my husband met him, Jer’s demeanor switched from debate to encouragement. Kelly’s presence alone made my husband comfortable and they visited about a lot of aspects of things.

Greg Peterson,  Founding Partner

Kelly was excellent to work with. His different approach at looking at money was an eye opener to us. We will continue to work with Kelly in the future and highly recommend having Kelly involved when it comes to investing.

Edward Hilton,  Chief Technology Officer

Kelly has exceeded all of my expectations. He provided education, experience, excellence and integrity! This is so important when working with a client's personal finances. As a school educator I appreciate his focus on education so that I could make the most informed financial decisions. I have a much clearer understanding of banking, finance, and investment now, and this will help my family currently and in the years to come. Thank you Kelly and kudos to the Mountain Financial team!